Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Sumit Nagal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs S. Nagal

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

5'10" (178 cm)

151

C. Rank

277

128

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$577.5K

Plays

Right-Handed

Sumit Nagal

IND

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

5'10" (178 cm)

151

C. Rank

277

128

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$539.0K

Career Money

$577.5K

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 1 Nagal

They have played 5 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Sumit Nagal winning 3. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Sumit Nagal was at the Miami Open - Miami, 19-03-2024, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 3-6 6-1 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wong	1
Nagal	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q3) Miami Open - Miami(03-19-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Sumit Nagal

(R2) Bengaluru Challenger(02-15-24)

Stats

Sumit Nagal

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

C. L. C. Wong vs S. Nagal H2H Profile

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	S. Nagal
$538,970	Career Prize Money	$577,520
55.78% (164-130)	Career Total W/L	59.35% (365-250)
1	Hard	1
2	Titles	15
1	Total H2H Matches	1
45.45% (5-6)	YTD Win/Loss	40.00% (2-3)

C. L. C. Wong vs S. Nagal Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.19% of points on their second serve, while Sumit Nagal has won 43.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 45.22% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sumit Nagal has won 49.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.37% and 30.80% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 52.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sumit Nagal has saved 53.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 51.61% of matches played (W/L 32/30), with Sumit Nagal winning 55.74% (W/L 34/27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Sumit Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 256/156), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16), where as Sumit Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.70% of matches (W/L 27/19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 1 times and Sumit Nagal being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2 and Sumit Nagal winning 3.
The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Sumit Nagal was at the Miami Open - Miami, 19-03-2024, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 3-6 6-1 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:30.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.39 while Sumit Nagal has played against players with an average rank of 285.07.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sumit Nagal has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 34.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sumit Nagal has converted 38.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Sumit Nagal Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. L. C. Wong vs S. Nagal H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	S. Nagal
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	3
23	Games Won	25
20	Aces (Total)	7
8	Total Double Faults	7
1:58:30	Average Match Time	1:58:30
63% (102/163)	1st Serve %	70% (129/183)
74% (75/102)	1st Serve Win %	68% (88/129)
36% (22/61)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (26/54)
21% (4/19)	Break Pts Won %	36% (5/14)
38% (69/183)	Return Points Win %	40% (66/163)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

S. Nagal Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Valencia Challenger - 06-10-2025
QF Henri SquireH. Squire	L	7-6(5) 6-4	Stats
R2 Pablo Llamas RuizP. Llamas	W	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
R1 Daniel Merida AguilarD. Merida	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
Q3 Alexander RitschardA. Ritschard	W	6-4 1-6 7-5	Stats
Q1 Andres Santamarta RoigA. Santamarta	W	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong vs S. Nagal Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. L. C. Wong	Stats	S. Nagal
55.78% (164/130)	YTD Win/Loss	59.35% (365/250)
54.07% (372/316)	Sets Win/Loss	58.02% (832/602)
51.16% (3419/3264)	Games Win/Loss	53.25% (7036/6176)
58.90% (129/90)	Hard Win/Loss	56.65% (98/75)
46.51% (20/23)	Clay Win/Loss	62.14% (256/156)
50.00% (9/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.74% (11/16)
42.86% (6/8)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/3)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.13
1687	Aces Total	831
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
603	Total Double Faults	1318
1:31:40	Average Match Time	1:33:45
371.13	Average Opponent Rank	482.39
60% (11331/18739)	1st Serve %	68% (25789/38100)
71% (8054/11331)	1st Serve Win %	64% (16550/25789)
49% (3631/7408)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (6191/12297)
41% (703/1718)	Break Points Won % (Total)	44% (2012/4564)
38% (7230/18830)	Return Points Win %	43% (16784/39097)
53.33% (8/7)	Slam W/L	33.33% (10/20)
46.67% (7/8)	Masters W/L	35.71% (5/9)
62.50% (5/3)	Cups W/L	60.00% (6/4)
27.27% (3/8)	Main Tour W/L	42.37% (25/34)
55.65% (69/55)	Challenger W/L	58.60% (201/142)
59.50% (72/49)	Futures W/L	75.00% (117/39)
55% (157/286)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (355/591)
83% (5/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	25% (4/16)
55% (56/102)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (89/155)
54% (51/94)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (94/193)
87% (157/136)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (382/324)
13% (157/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (382/56)
20% (137/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (233/40)